Testing
Overview
Testing
Services
Personnel
Equipment
Industries
Served
Test
Methods
Pollutants
Sources
Training
Oversight
Technical
Procedures
Technical
Questions
Safety
Quality |
|
|
Sample
and Velocity Traverse Points – USEPA Method 1
USEPA Method 1 provides guidance for the selection of sampling ports
and traverse points at which sampling for air pollutants will be
performed. This method is designed to aid in the representative
measurement of pollutant emissions and/or total volumetric flow
rate from a stationary source. A measurement site where the
effluent stream is flowing in a known direction is selected, and
the cross-section of the stack is divided into a number of equal
areas. Traverse points are then located within each of these
equal areas.
The requirements of this method must be considered before construction
of a new facility from which emissions are to be measured; failure
to do so may require subsequent alterations to the stack or deviation
from the standard procedure. Cases involving variants are
subject to approval by the Administrator.
This method is applicable to gas streams flowing in ducts, stacks,
and flues. It cannot be used when:
- the flow
is cyclonic or swirling,
- a stack
is smaller than 0.30 meter (12 in.) in diameter,
- a stack
is smaller than 0.071 m2 (113 in.2) in cross-sectional area.
Two procedures
for determining cyclonic flow are presented in Method 1: a
simplified procedure, and an alternative measurement site procedure.
The magnitude of cyclonic flow of effluent gas in a stack or duct
is the only parameter quantitatively measured in the simplified
procedure. The simplified procedure cannot be used when the
measurement site is less than two stack or duct diameters downstream
or less than a half diameter upstream from a flow disturbance.
In these cases, the alternative measurement site procedure, which
involves traversing the source with a directional flow-sensing probe
(3D Probe), must be used to measure the pitch and yaw angles of
the gas flow at 40 or more traverse points. The resultant
angle is then calculated and compared to acceptable criteria for
mean and standard deviation.
|